Quantcast They Said it Couldn't Happen | Seattle Washington Estate Law | Estate, Senate, Repeal, Year, Measure, House, Vote
 
 

What Others Are Saying

  • Buy life insurance, but don't retain 'incidents of ownership ... 19 May 2012 | 9:04 am

    Typically, you can protect your family by securing adequate life insurance coverage. But how much will they receive after Uncle Sam siphons off a portion for the federal estate tax?

  • Business News and Articles, Local Business Listing Services ... 19 May 2012 | 8:04 am

    The U.S. heirs of wealthy taxpayers who renounce their citizenship usually owe inheritance tax equal to the U.S. estate tax on assets left to them by the expatriate. (This doesn't apply to spouses who are U.S. citizens.) For example, a woman ...

  • Will Facebook IPO Boost Local Real Estate? 19 May 2012 | 7:10 am

    Will Facebook IPO Boost Local Real EstateTax revenue from Facebook's $104 billion IPO may not fill California's $16 billion budget deficit, but it will likely give a boost to Silicon Valley's already inflated real estate prices. The median home ...

  • Asset Defense Trust in Masters Benefits Preparing | Social ... 19 May 2012 | 6:56 am

    A good Intentionally Faulty Grantor Trust is a trust that treats your assets inside trust in another way for income tax purposes compared to estate tax and present tax functions New York asset protection. The seasoned will be the grantor, but not ...

  • Michael-In-Norfolk - Coming Out In Mid Life: It Doesn't Have to ... 19 May 2012 | 6:29 am

    However, it can create certain negative estate tax treatment depending on the size of one's taxable estate. Historically, deeds creating a tenancy by the entirety have been reserved for husband and wife couples. In light of the Virginia ...

 
Home Blogs Derek's Tax Blog They Said it Couldn't Happen
Written by Derek W. Jensen
Tuesday, 15 December 2009 14:16
Share/Save/Bookmark

Rep.Earl Pomeroy says that efforts to get an estate tax fix in this year have failed and that repeal is likely. This follows the Dec. 3rd vote by the house to extend the current estate tax exemptions and rates indefinitely. The Senate has failed to take up that measure, focusing instead on the continuing health care debate, which Senate leaders have vowed to complete this year. However, the Senate must pass a defense appropriations bill and an increase in the federal debt ceiling before they break for the year. These bills will likely come to a vote in the House this week. House leaders are completing negotiations with Senate leaders so that these bills will be able to passed by the Senate as is, forestalling the need for conference committee bills.

Over the last week or so it has become clear that the House estate tax bill was not going to fly in the Senate and that a compromise, possibly a one or two year extension of the current law, would be necessary. The most likely way to get the measure through would be to add it to the defense appropriations bill, which has become the "last helicopter out of Saigon". To make the measure more palatable to the Senate, it was reduced to an extension of only 2 months. That would have prevented the January repeal, but would have set the stage for further debate in 2010.

With the Democratic leadership and the President behind the extension of the current estate tax law, it seemed an easy call to many to say that next year's repeal of the estate tax wouldn't happen. But the estate tax creates strange bedfellows as was illustrated in the vote in the House on December 3rd where all of the Republicans (in favor of full repeal), Liberal Democrats (in favor of a higher estate tax), and farm state Democrats (in favor of a higher exemption) all voted against the measure. Those same forces are in the Senate where the Republicans would be happy to see the one year repeal believing it will enable them to permanently repeal the estate tax in the future or at least give them a good campaign issue. There are also enough Democrats in the Senate who are unwilling to vote for the measure thereby preventing the 60 votes necessary to move it along.

Does this mean that someone who dies on January 1st will avoid taxation? Probably not. Again from Rep. Pomeroy, "the prospects are 100%" that Congress will come back next year and reinstate the tax, and make it retroactive to Jan. 1, 2010. Then again, they said it couldn't happen in the first place.

 

Estate Tax in the News